Rated 5 out of 5 by from Very Happy with This Product We have used a ton of this for mounting on coroplast as well as for decals. It is scratch resistant and works very well.
Date published: 2021-06-07
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Our go-to printing substrate for non-reflective We go through around 20 rolls a year just in our shop alone and I know our Spokane location goes through a fair amount as well. We use this substrate for all our non-reflective signage and we've been extremely happy with the quality and the price per roll. Grimco rep. David Olson is always great at keeping us up to date with any promotions on this product as well. We purchase and prefer the matte finish for printing, but the gloss print quality is great too. We laminate with Briteline's semi-gloss/gloss laminate.
Date published: 2021-05-06
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Briteline Duration - IM3201 & IM 3203 We always use this vinyl in our Latex printer and it works wonderful.
Date published: 2021-04-20
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great Material to Apply to Coroplast or Foamboard I use this to make yard signs and it is very forgiving when applying to coroplast blanks.
Date published: 2019-06-26
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Excellent Vinyl I find this to be an excellent vinyl. I wet apply it with ease. I haven't found any flaws in the adhesive or the vinyl as I use it.
Date published: 2019-01-07
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Economy for sure! Its a decent vinyl for cheap jobs or for budget cautious clients....
Date published: 2024-03-27
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Briteline Usually use Oracal but tried this product seems to work great. So far no complaints.
Date published: 2023-01-04
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Decals Purchased to use for decals. Works well with HP Latex machine with provided on board profile.. Very little curl after laminating. Paired with 3M 8505 overlaminate and it worked great. Customer was very happy.
Date published: 2021-03-06
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Did..something change? Ran out of the material and loaded this new roll. I used the same profiles, same ink, same drying, same everything EXCEPT for the roll -- which was bought recently. The sticker prints came out dry and cracked with a gritty feeling with not as much contrast in color.
Date published: 2021-09-08
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Nice print, poor install Not a very good quality vinyl. I think even cast or calendar vinyl is easier to apply. Print quality is quite good though. But application is extremely difficult compared to pretty much any other vinyl.
Date published: 2020-07-24
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Briteline IM-3203 This is a good product but I ordered the wrong thing! I strongly suggest IM3203X for your customers as it blocks out anything I need to cover.
Date published: 2019-06-12
Rated 2 out of 5 by from A change for the worse. Following the recent demise of our previous workhorse vinyl of 8 years, IM5651, the same great changes have finally made it over to IM3201. And by great I mean terrible. Drab white point, flimsy, uneven surface, shrinkage under ink loads etc... It just looks bad even after lamination. It's like whomever is the decider on these things said "okay guys listen up, for 2022 let's completely destroy the Briteline... line". Well, mission accomplished. We can get 3m and oracal anywhere. I bought hundreds of rolls of Briteline for a reason and if it wasn't for my amazing rep Nolan holding me down for years, I would go elsewhere. If I sound bitter it's because I totally am.
Date published: 2022-10-26
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Nice look but difficult to apply. The ink retention/saturation quality is good. The problem is it's hard to lay down. Originally thought the problem was related to ink drying time but it's not. Very hard to keep it from curling and/or flopping over and wrinkling when it using it on our roller applicators. Attempting to fix it you have a high chance of stretching it out of any usability. We've had to reprint several times as a result.
Date published: 2020-09-28
Rated 1 out of 5 by from This is NOT an Opaque Vinyl Even though the description says it's Opaque it is NOT Opaque. Girl on the phone wanted to argue it was more opaque than translucent. What a joke.
Date published: 2023-06-13